Last conversation I had with Paulo Romão Brás and Sandro Resende was intended to provide me with enough background information on their new work for the upcoming exhibition “I LOVE YOU, OH, YOU PAY MY RENT” at the Galeria São Bento in Lisbon, that I could write a text for their catalogue. What resulted was that in the process not only I would come to fall for their photobjects but also come to terms with the thing theory, which applied to vernacular photography provides ample speculation about what’s lurking underneath their unique work. So here is a sneak preview into their world, which will go on display on september 13th (download pr_i-love-you.pdf for further details)
Can people love things and things pay people’s rent?
Paulo Romão Brás and Sandro Resende’s new exhibition project I Love You, Oh, You Pay My Rent exposes a method of working together that reflects the materiality relationships are made of, and- more up to the point- explores the shifting boundaries between people and objects. This is territory where definitions of objecthood or selfhood need to be stretched in order to account for that subliminal state of thingyness where objects and humans enter a third zone at the margin of conceptual meaning and certainty.
Paulo shows Dark Parables, ten photo-objects composed out of drawings sketched directly onto digital scans of photographic images and output as digital photographs. Paulo sourced these images from his personal archive of found photographs, a collection he has been building since 1986, selecting particular images of people characterized by its uncanniness– where shadows, erasures, double exposures and scratches perform a defamiliarising effect- to create a new set of narratives. In Dark Parables, a further development is obtained through juxtapositions of photograph’s own materiality – the textured “lived” photographic surface as an indexical anchor into the reality encroached onto it- with the drawing’s hand drawn bodily presence. References to narratives lost to history are weaved into these interventions, raising questions about the objectification of memory and the place of fiction in our relation to photography. Particularly, what is highlighted is the position of amateur photography (as wedding pictures, snapshot photos, family albums) and its value in the art system where they are “the other” that, according to Geoffrey Batchen (2001): “ Represent the troublesome field of vernacular photography; they are the abject photographies for which an appropriate history must now be written.. the part of (photography) history that has been pushed to the margins (or beyond them to oblivion)” 2

In this sense they represent an absence that is further developed into Sandro’s own work for this exhibition. Titled Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread, it is formed by a triptych of one photo and two drawings. One of the departing points was a moment of free association, originated in response to Paulo’s found photos. Without seeing the images, and based only on its verbal description, Sandro staged his photograph. There, we see a man – in a central position and in what seems to confer him the role of the main character- holding a plate with a “thing”. Three women sit away from him, in a secondary position but equally facing the viewer. Accompanying the photo there are two drawings, each representing the “thing” that, in Sandro’s words, could also be described as “social emptiness” but is, in fact, an unspeakable objectification of people through denial of communication. The “thing” is, in fact, a main element in Sandro’s video work Twenty Seven, a video which the viewer is alienated from, as this is not exhibited in the gallery and can only be anticipated through this extraneous scene, like a surplus that exceeds the video narrative and erupts into the current project as extra frame.

In the text Can the Sofa Speak? A Look at Thing Theory (2001), John Plotz elaborates on the “sense of failure, or partial failure, to name or to classify” that is the main focus of thing theory, and that investigates people or objects that become things because they come to occupy “…the margins—of language, of cognition, of material substance. “Things” do not lie beyond the bounds of reason, to be sure (that would be absurd or paradoxical, or flat out impossible), but at times they may seem to. That seeming is significant: these are limit cases at which our ordinary categories for classifying signs and substances, meaning and materiality, appear to break down.”2
This interest for the lacunas of knowledge is present in both artists’ projects. Whilst Paulo is interested in what happens when photo-objects cross boundaries and become things, Sandro is concerned with the consequences of human relationships that dehumanise people and commodify them into things. What they share in their photo-drawings is thus the blurring of boundaries between people and objects and the creation of fictional worlds where people love things and things pay people’s rent.
1 Geoffrey Batchen, 2001. Vernacular photographies. In Each Wild Idea, Writing, Photography, History. Cambridge, Massachusets; London, England: The MIT PRESS, pp. 56-80.
2 John Plotz, 2005. Can the Sofa Speak? A Look at Thing Theory. Criticism, Volume 47(Number 1), pp. 109-118.
No Comments