[ msdm ] :::mother sister daughter meow

Alice Park
Current perspectives on the role of art in urban development. Do artistic interventions benefit a community?
Art in Community Settings, Birkbeck College, University of London 2004, Published in SOS:OK guide, msdm publications 2004

[download full sos:ok guide pdf 17.7MB]

Regeneration is a term that is used to refer to the stimulation of ‘deprived’ urban environments through strategic economic development. Increasingly there is seen to be a role for artists in regeneration as the value of the arts in urban development is being promoted by government, local authorities and other development agencies. The main roles assigned to the arts in this process include beautification and/or contribution to an identity or an identifiable icon to encourage tourism and investment in an area. The creative industries are also proving to be effective in providing employment diversification for local economies. Indeed, the contribution of the arts and culture in regeneration is increasingly quantified and promoted as evidenced by statistics currently on the website of the Office for the Deputy Prime Minister. The statistics indicate that:

creative industries have a turnover of £60 billion per year and employ more than 1.4 million people in the UK
the leisure industry provides over 10% of total employment and brings in over £20 billion per annum in foreign exchange
tourism employs 1.75 million people and has a turnover of £53 billion. Tourism accounts for 1 in 6 of all new jobs created in the last 10 years.

The government describes arts and culture as a “growth sector” and part of a “new economy based on services” . In the first section of this essay, I aim to investigate what is so new about these activities and why there is an increasing trend towards using artists in regeneration programmes. In order to address these questions I will consider the work of David Harvey (1990) who investigates the implications for urban areas of the changing modes of economic production. Having explored the context for the emergence of the arts and creative industries in urban development, I will then consider what the impact of this in relation to regeneration has been. This will involve consideration of the work of Hans Mommas (1990) and John Urry (2000) who reveal how new economic modes of production can actually contribute to the problems of urban areas rather than remedy them. Finally I will consider how alternative approaches might be employed to ensure that the arts can be used in regeneration in a way that benefits communities socially as well as economically.


The second part of this essay translates the ideas from part one into the context of Bermondsey, South London. I will consider how the closure of factories in this area has left people without jobs or social infrastructure and how the government, through its regeneration schemes using the arts and creative industries, has produced a new image for the area which does not relate to residents and has led to the exacerbation of social problems. I will then move on to investigate how an arts project could be developed to address this problem and have real benefits for the community.

Part I
The first part of this essay involves thinking about why ‘regeneration’ is currently such a hot topic and why the arts and culture are seen to play an increasingly important role in the process of urban development. In order to begin to think about this, it is useful to look at the work of urban theorist David Harvey. In his paper ‘Time Space Compression and the Post Modern Condition’ (1990), Harvey illustrates how changes in modes of production impact on local economies and local people.


Economies are always changing in response to technological advancements. While these changes happen gradually over time, particular ‘paradigm shifts’ are represented throughout history. In his paper, Harvey describes the paradigm shift characterising the change from Fordist to post-Fordist modes of production. This shift represents the change from economic processes based on production lines and the mass consumption of standardised products, to new 'information technologies' which involve more flexible, decentralised forms of labour and work organisation. While Fordist production initially represented reduced costs and increased profits resulting from the complex division of labour, a number of factors have now meant that this type of production is no longer cost effective. Harvey describes the two main changes, which have characterised this shift as, the “decentralisation of production” and the increasing importance of information and “image production” (Harvey, 1990).


The decentralisation of production is described by Harvey as a process of “vertical disintegration”. He explains that this has occurred as a result of a new “just in time” delivery system which, as a result of new technologies, has meant that less product needs to be kept on site as production is sped up and turnover times are increased. It follows that, by increasing turnover time, exchange and consumption can also be sped up. Indeed, as Harvey tells us, “improved systems of communication and information flow coupled with rationalisations in techniques of distributing (packaging, inventory control, market feed-back)” have made it possible to “circulate commodities through the market system with greater speed” (Harvey, 1990, p. 285).


The other characteristic of this shift from Fordist to post-Fordist production is the emphasis on information technologies and image production. A greater demand for, and a greater ability to provide, diversification of product choice has placed greater emphasis on marketing, packaging, and design, on the 'targeting' of consumers by lifestyle, taste and culture rather than by categories of social class. The result of vertical disintegration is that less space is required for production. In fact, in many cases, it becomes more efficient to actually export aspects of production so that all that is required to remain at ‘head office’ is the part of the company which produces information; creating an image and marketing the product.


So what are the implications of this shift for cities and urban development and where does regeneration fit in to all of this? The changes described above have had significant implications for cities both in terms of the change to local economies and the identity of areas and the people who live within them. The shift from Fordism to post-Fordism has meant that employers have withdrawn from areas where large sites for production once existed to take production to cheaper locations, leaving areas with high unemployment and collapsed local economies. It has also meant that people who used to work within the Fordist system have been left with extremely specialised skills that can not be applied in other positions. Both these factors have contributed significantly to urban deprivation. As a result of this shift, it has been necessary to re-think these areas in relation to the new modes of production, or to ‘regenerate’ them.


In ‘Time Space Compression and the Post Modern Condition’ Harvey describes how Fordist modes of production are being replaced by those based on leisure, information and services. Certainly, this is reinforced by the statistics produced by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister mentioned in the introduction to this essay. Such changes are currently manifested in urban areas such as old port towns and industrial areas which have been converted into centres for leisure and tourism and creative industries. Glasgow and Liverpool are high profile examples of this in process taking place in large urban areas. Such changes can enable areas to be promoted as attractive places to spend time and money with consequent positive investment in local economies.


In addition to providing employment, the arts can also contribute to regeneration though the process of ‘beautification’ or by creating an image or identity for an area. This may be as simple as the creation of landscape features such as promenades, benches and bollards, or involve the creation of large public art works, such as Antony Gormley’s Angel of the North, which becomes iconic to an area. Such features can make for attractive destinations for visitors and for other investment, thereby stimulating tourism and economic development.
We have now established that the arts can play a role in regeneration in two ways. The first is by replacing old forms of industry, in the form of creative industries and work in the cultural sector, to provide employment. The second is to create an identity for an area that serves to attract visitors and investment. The next part of this essay involves thinking about the social impact of this form of arts-led regeneration on local people. I will argue that the aspects of arts-led regeneration we have considered can lead to the gentrification of an area whereby the perceived benefits of regeneration bypass those who are local to the area.


The first issue to be considered as part of this argument is the result of the new forms of cultural sector employment. While we have established that the arts and creative industries can play an important role in boosting deprived economies by fitting into the space left by redundant forms of industry, in very few cases is it those who lost their jobs when former industry collapsed that gain new forms of employment. As disused above, the Fordist mode of production required a highly specialised workforce which reflected the production line. In contrast, different and more broad skills are required for new employment areas and, as a result, are attracting new people rather than providing jobs for those who already live there.


The second issue to be considered is the impact of using the arts to create urban identities which are geared towards attract tourism and other forms of commercial investment. This is an issue considered by Hans Mommas in his paper The Fatal Spectacle (1990). Mommas provides insight into the implications of using arts-led regeneration to create an identity for an area with the intention of attracting visitors and investment. The main argument in his paper is that the process of change towards an economy of arts, culture and leisure has resulted in the creation of cities which are purely designed to attract tourists and investments at the cost of local needs. Mommas describes a “deliberate, integrated ‘imagineering’ of the physical and symbolic environment” (Mommas, 1990, p38). This ‘imagineering’, he tells us, is undertaken by politicians who are trying to create a particular image for a city in order to attract investment. This phenomenon is attributed to the increasing global focus of cities. He describes how increasingly the creation of images works on a global level where cities are competing. This competition, whereby cities are attempting to standardised what is on offer yet create a market niche, results in “increasing ‘spectacularisation’ and integration of what is on offer” rather than considering any real sense of place or people (Mommas, 1990, p.40).


John Urry, in ‘The Landscape of Places and Images, Reworking Identity for the City and Countryside’, reiterates Mommas’ views on urban development. However his paper also considers the implication of ‘image production’ on the communities who live within the areas in which this takes place. Referring to urban theorist Sharon Zukin, Urry argues that “constructed landscapes” and “commodified spaces”, that is places where tourist go to ‘consume’ the product which Mommas refers to as the “spectacularised city”, pose problems for people’s social identities (Urry, 2000, p.23). This is because social identities have historically been founded on place. Certainly in a time when large proportions of an urban area were employed in a large factory or port, a social identity was developed alongside this. People worked together, created social networks and had lives which revolved around their workplaces. The fact that places are now being constructed around the notion of consumption is resulting in a lack of social identity for areas and the people within them.


So Mommas and Urry have indicated that while arts-led regeneration has the ability to attract investment by creating an image for the city, it can also have negative implications for people’s social identities as the images produced often will have little to do with the people who actually live there. Ironically, this form of regeneration can therefore lead to social isolation and deprivation as a sense of cohesion is denied to local people.


So while the arts and creative industries can have positive effects in economically regenerating urban areas, this approach can also lead to the socially problematic phenomenon of gentrification. In such cases the benefits of economic development bypass those who need them most as efforts are focused towards attracting people from outside the area and creating new jobs that do not match local skills. So are arts and creative industries in fact a negative factor in urban development? Malcolm Miles, in his book Art Space and the City - Public Art and Urban Futures, takes as his focus the role of public art in urban development and sheds light on how the arts can be used effectively to contribute to social regeneration and avoid gentrification.


In identifying variables to distinguish between arts-led regeneration that has positive effects on a community and that which doesn’t, Miles differentiates between public art work that focuses on ‘process’ and that which prioritises ‘product’. Thinking about this distinction in relation to the writings of Mommas and Urry, we could align arts related activity that is ‘product’ focused with the “politician led” activity they describe which ‘spetacularises’ urban areas or produces “constructed landscapes” and “commodified spaces”. In contrast, Miles describes ‘process’ focused arts projects as having, as central to their purpose, an aspect of community participation and some sort of engagement with social and political processes (Miles, 1997, p. 166). In such cases arts projects, which may certainly have the same effect of creating an identity for an area as those described by Mommas and Urry (thus satisfying the demands of global competition), involve working with particular communities to develop and explore ideas of spatial and social identity that are genuine rather than constructed.


A second distinguishing characteristic of Miles’ ‘process’ focused public art, is that the aims of these type of project relate to social gains rather than commercial ones. This is not to say that such projects will not have economic benefits – certainly such projects can enable people to “communicate with other people, build self-esteem”, acquire skills, improved health and well being, and move outside situations of social isolation (Miles, 1997, p.170) – in a way that contributes to economic development. However the pubic art Miles promotes is explicit about its ethical standpoint and does not ignore local needs.

 

Part II


In order to demonstrate the arguments presented in the first part of this essay, I have chosen to present a case study which illustrates an area that is currently undergoing a process of urban regeneration. I have chosen to look at the area surrounding a now disused biscuit factory in Bermondsey, South London. I will first provide a background to the area, and then sketch out an idea for an artistic intervention that could be delivered in a way that has positive benefits for the community local to the area.


Until very recently Bermondsey in South London has been regarded as an unsavoury area. This image resulted from the decline in factory employment in the area and subsequent unemployment and social deprivation. However the image of Bermondsey is shifting. It is now not unusual to see articles about Bermondsey as ‘the’ place to live in media such as Time Out. Certainly, in recent years, the arts and creative industries have begun to emerge to replace now defunct forms of Fordist industry. The area is now home to many artists’ studios as well as larger cultural institutions such as Tate Modern and the London Fashion Museum. These new ‘industries’ have been successful in attracting people to the area and contribute to an image of the area as a burgeoning cultural quarter. The immediate area surrounding the old Peek Frean biscuit factory in Bermondsey has also received an injection of arts infused regeneration with artists’ studios and galleries being established around it and the factory itself being converted into creative industry units. Economically, this represents significant change for the area as the local economy begins to thrive. However, in order to understand the social impact of these changes it is useful to first understand not only how the factory was central to local employment but also how it contributed to the social identity of people in the area.


The firm Peek Frean established a biscuit making business in South East London in the 1800s. Peek Frean produced the first short-eating biscuits at prices within reach of the public at large. It produced biscuit novelties and the first British wheat crisp bread Vita-Wheat. However the factory was more that just a place that produced biscuits. An article entitled ‘How Biscuit Town began’ describes how “a complete little town [was] built up for the production of P.F. biscuits”(p.5). ‘Biscuit Town’ had bake houses and packing rooms but also had its own package making shops, label printing department, ‘displays’ studios, tailoring department, steam laundry, staff of builders, carpenters and engineers, its own fire brigade, electric power house and internal post office. It had a medical department which included a doctor, dentists and a trained nurse. It also had a staff restaurant, advisory committees and a Welfare Department (p.5). At the time this represented the most efficient means of organising production, but it also resulted in the creation of a sense of community amongst employees from the local area and provided a distinct identity for the area.


However, as discussed in part one of this essay, technological advancements eventually rendered this type of production inefficient and led to closure of such establishment. When the Peek Frean factory closed in the 1970s many people who had worked in the factory all their lives, and had developed skills particular to the production of biscuits, were left without employment. The loss of the factory would also have meant that many of the social functions the company fulfilled were also lost. While, as discussed earlier, a new image is emerging for this area, the images that are being created and projected to ‘ideal’ residents and investors by the local authority and other development agencies do not replace, for local people, what has been lost by the closure of the Peek Frean factory.


Picking up on the ideas of Malcolm Miles, we can begin to think about how an alternative identity for the area could be developed, using public art, for local people who have felt the impact of the Peak Frean factory closure. As suggested by Miles, this should involve participation of and dialogue with local people. This might involve working with an artist to consult with the community about memories and personal histories of the area. The project may create material expressions of this process, for example a statue of a local ‘hero’ or replicas of factory equipment from Peak Frean, or some sort of publication, however it may also just be about the process of creating a dialogue within the community. As Miles suggests, the focus should be on the process rather than a final product. In developing such a project, my idea would involve working with residents local to the area to build a community archive which aims to: develop ‘local narratives’ against the grand narratives of international modernism and multinational economic interests, defining the specificity of the voices suppressed by mainstream culture.


I this case we can think of the ‘grand narratives’ as the image of Bermondsey, created by government and others involved in ‘image making’ as a new and groovy place to live and invest. In doing this, the project should be community led with objectives which have been developed collaboratively. As such, no exact project framework will be presented here as it would be wrong to impose this on the community. Instead the aim would be to create a project which involves the community in project planning and development (as facilitated by an artist) so that it can develop organically and be locally owned. However, I have listed below a number of principles that will guide the development of the project in order to ensure that it is a project that contributes effectively to regeneration rather than gentrification.

Principles of the project:

Enable a long term artists’ residency
Many projects which involve an artist do so in a way which does not allow real engagement between the artist and the community in which he/she works. By providing an extended period of residency the project will enable a sense of trust to be developed whereby residents can feel that the artists is committed to their environment and a greater involvement and ownership in the project can result.

Build local capacity
Long term community sustainability depends on developing human and social capital. It is important that every opportunity is taken to develop local skills and capacity. This can be achieved by involving local people in surveying their own situation, running their own programmes and managing local assets.

Employ a range of methods for enabling community involvement
It is important to provide a range of entry points for community involvement. It is a good idea to use a variety of involvement methods. So while workshops will be appropriate for some, others will feel more comfortable at meetings and others in informal discussions on the street.
By following such guidelines, it will be possible to ensure that a project will be developed that contributes to the area’s regeneration in a way that is sensitive to local needs.

 

Conclusion
In this paper I have looked at the role of artists in regeneration and found that claims to the success of using the arts in urban development must be qualified to reflect the difference between economic and social regeneration of areas. In the first section of this essay I discussed how a shift in the economic mode of production from factory based production to new information based industry has been problematic for local economies which were built up to sustain older forms of industry which reflected complex divisions of labour. I then discussed how arts, creative industries, tourism and leisure activities, (the latter being, to a large extent, dependent on the former) are being encouraged in areas formerly dependent on Fordist modes of production to boost economies by providing employment and attracting investment. From here I began to investigate exactly who was benefiting from the changes encouraged through this form of regeneration. I considered how the jobs by these new industries are not filled by local people but by people coming from outside the area. I also considered how the images being created to attract investment, a second characteristic of post-Fordism, do not contribute to a local identity or cohesion for people living there, but rather one that is aimed towards tourists and investors. It was thus established that regeneration activities involving arts and creative industries could actually contribute to the problems people face in local areas through the process of gentrification.


In attempting to redress the balance, I then turned to the work of Malcolm Miles. Focusing on public art work, Miles makes an important distinction between projects which focus on ‘product’ and those that focus on ‘process’. While the idea of 'product' can be aligned with the type of identity creating activity that is considered problematic by Mommas and Urry, projects focused on ‘process’ prioritises community participation and engage with social and political issues. The results of such work can have significant impact on communities which make real contributions to social as well as economic regeneration.


In the second part of the paper I proposed the development of a project which would stimulate community cohesion and contribute to the creation of a local identity in an area, thereby demonstrating how the arts can be used in a positive way to contribute to the regeneration of local areas.

 

Bibliography
Mommas, Hans (1990/01) ‘The Fatal Spectacle’, Archis:41
Harvey, David (1990) ‘Time Space Compression and the Post Modern Condition’ in The Condition of Post-Modernity, Blackwell.
Urry, John (2000) The Landscape of Places and Images, Reworking Identity for the City and Countryside, Werk, Bauen& Wohnen.
Miles, Malcolm (1997), Art Space and the City - Public Art and Urban Futures, Routledge.
The Steam Biscuit Manufactory of Messrs Peek Frean & Co, articles from the Southwark Collection, London Borough of Southwark.
‘How Biscuit Town Began’ in Biscuit Town.


 

 

 

 
 
design | paula roush hosting |msdm